In one of my earlier posts, I had written about the case for selection based
So are we slowly moving to a more fair society? Will universal meritocracy ensure that? Hold on!!!!!!!! It is now widely accepted that Merit (intelligence, looks, strength etc.) is an outcome of both nature and nurture. To what extent nature (inheritance) effects Merit is yet to be clear. But the point is that if one is born with the genes that to an extent provide him with the merit to claim success, is it fair to not endow the less meritorious just because he didn't have the right genes? So what is the solution? Of course it's all dependent on time and the research efforts in genetics, proteomics and neuroscience. Once it's known exactly how much genes are responsible for merit, one can impose a suitable Merit Tax on lines of the inheritance tax. The other option may be to endow every human being with the same genetic traits responsible for all forms of Merit - and that would be the next human species with uniformity all across.
2 comments:
Hi FNR..
I have indeed read Huxley's book..But Huxley talks of a casteist society in which people are ranked based on their genetic capability and accordingly assigned tasks... I would rather advocate a uniform human species...
Also, have you read Michel Houllebecq's Atomised..builds on some of Huxley's ideas- a great read anyways
@ Dhiman....
Thats the whole point of my post- We can have proportional fairness, but as you see, genes to some extent contribute to which person can contribute more...
And no matter what the goal of a society, everyone agrees in principle that what you get in life must be because of your efforts rather than your biological composition at birth..
Post a Comment