The biggest news these days is the strike by the airport employees. The problem with both sides in this incident is that everyone is agitated based on mistaken hypotheses.
Let’s first consider the common man, who hates the airport employees for going on strike. He believes that Indian airports will become world class once these pampered employees are put on a leash. Having traveled through quite a few airports around the world, my limited experience suggests that this perception may be wrong. I feel that Indian airports are the most efficient; our airport staff are the most friendly; security and immigration procedures are very efficient, and the airports are also the safest with no terrorist linked incident having originated from any Indian airport. While American and British airports have needlessly cumbersome and suspicious procedures, the East Asian airports only offer a cold commercial experience; and I won’t even consider Charles D’Gaulle as an airport. Most of us who have been to
Consider the other side- the airport employees. PSU employees dread privatization. They believe privatization leads to loss of jobs, pension, perks, prestige and extended working hours. A few years back, I had the opportunity to work as a consultant with a PSU undergoing privatization. The employees there had termed the monthly KRA meetings (meetings to identifying Key Responsibility Areas) as “Kyu Rakhe Aapko” meetings – such was the dread. But I think layoffs in private sector in
Let’s see when this issue dies away. Even when it is resolved, don’t expect any useful changes.
Shivaji...I think it's about whether the Govt can afford to invest so much money in airport infrastructure development. Also, why should it, given that the private sector is ready to step in (at least in this case)? After all, shouldn't public money be used for things that benefit a much larger section of the population, considering the people who fly still constitute a relatively miniscule proportion?
As for the job security aspect, I think there's been a detailed discussion of that on many blogs. What's more, we have seen with many disinvestment projects that there have hardly been any job losses.
Anyhow. I agree with you on the safety aspect of our airports and the courteousness of the security staff. However, you paint an overly rosy picture. The facilities themselves are quite poor, particularly at international terminals. Not only that, they are utterly unequipped to handle the increased traffic. I have travelled quite a bit through Singapore, and Changi is simply the best airport I have seen (among airports in India, USA, UK, Melbourne, Sydney and Frankfurt). The facilities provided are just awesome.
One point - the security staff are CISF, not AAI employees.
Mumbai airport needs more than just repainting. The international terminals are a national disgrace. First impressions go a long way, and the international terminal greets newly arriving passengers with filth, incompetence and confusion. The concept of customer service is utterly lacking there. Like the story of the five blind men and the elephant, visitors walk away with a bad taste and a poor impression of India -which disadvantages us in the global playing field.
Can AAI build a new airport? Sure. Do they have any incentive to do it competently and on time? No. That's the fundamental reason behind privatization - help the country catch up to the world by channelizing capitalist greed into infrastructure projects.
accepted, Duty Free Shops are not essential nor necessarily valuable, but the more pressing reason for modernization (with or without privatization) is the complete lack of infrastructure in the form of runways, landing slots, and aerobridges. And with airlines ordering a hundred planes at a time, it's only going to get worse.
Anyone who feels that Indian airports are the most efficient should go through baggage claim when an international flight lands. Or the lines at immigration/customs. This is chaos in its purest form.
Can it be rectified? Sure it can. Can AAI do it? Maybe, they can. But my question to them, what stopped them from doing it all these years? If it is factors beyond their control, what is the guarantee that these hurdles will not be there in the future?
Shivaji... If you got kind service at Indian airports, you are one lucky dude. I once landed up at Mumbai's international terminal at 10 PM. They made me and several other passengers wait for 3 hours for a coach to take us to the domestic terminal. The less said about loos the better. It is very difficult to even get water in our airports.
I agree with your assessment of Charles De Gaulle. It is a waste of time with unfriendly french speaking louts.
Check out KL International Airport or Schipol. I guess all passengers want is not to be bothered and humiliated for every small thing which unfortunately happens in our airports. Most passengers do not want glitz and shopping in the airports. They just want functionality. Having said that Chennai airport is pretty decent.
Although I am for privatization, but I think privatization is not the only answer for the betterment of the Indian Airports. Indian Airlines et al. should take active part in strategic alliances such as Star Alliance. This will lead to synergy.
From reference as well as from personal experience the services and infrastructure at Indian Airports need improvement.
Since this is mainly a service industry, the most important factor is the delivery of the service which depends on airport staff/employees of course. Either the HR practices need modification (hire-fire system) or there is need of competition, which can be brought about by privatization.
Post a Comment